06 / 06

Cyber · AI · Digital intelligence

SEO, AEO & GEO visibility

Make expertise findable, understandable and citable by search engines and AI assistants.

Global network map in an empty intelligence briefing room Illustration · fictional scene

Modern visibility depends on technical quality, content structure, clear entities and demonstrable expertise. We work across the full path from indexation to a useful answer.

06

What the assignment should give you

  1. 01Architecture aligned with real search intent
  2. 02Content that is clearer to people and machines
  3. 03Metrics connecting visibility to business outcomes

How the assignment works

How the assignment works

A short, explicit process adapted to the sensitivity of the situation.

  1. 01

    Scoping

    We define the decision to support, relevant assets, constraints, authorised sources and required confidentiality.

  2. 02

    Investigation

    Collection and analysis follow the agreed scope. Facts, hypotheses and areas of uncertainty remain clearly separated.

  3. 03

    Prioritisation

    Each finding is assessed by reliability, likely impact and the effort required to act.

  4. 04

    Delivery

    You receive a readable synthesis, useful evidence and a roadmap that can be put into practice.

Possible deliverables

Possible deliverables

  • SEO, SXO, AEO and GEO audit
  • Editorial architecture and internal linking
  • Structured data and discovery files
  • Measurement dashboard and improvement plan

Common situations

Common situations

  • Redesign, migration or visibility loss
  • Expertise that is poorly understood or positioned
  • Preparation for answer engines and AI assistants

How can the assignment’s result be verified?

Use these examples to agree on a verifiable deliverable. Checks and thresholds follow the agreed scope; the examples below are not client results.

Example evidence and decisions to agree during scoping
What to checkEvidence to requestDecision it supports
Access and eligibilityHTTP response, robots, indexing directives, canonical and Search Console inspection; dated state.Fix an identified obstacle without promising indexing or ranking.
Documented answerTarget question, visible answer, sources, date, owner and structured data matching the content.Improve a useful answer or consolidate repetitive pages.
Language equivalentsIntent, content and journey compared; own canonical, reciprocal hreflang and links to actual translations.Publish usable equivalents rather than simply multiply URLs.
MeasurementImpressions and clicks by scope, period and device; conversions defined separately; explicit protocol for any observed AI citation.Separate visibility changes from outcomes without automatically assigning a cause to growth.

Put the decision to the test

Twice as many clicks, but fewer enquiries

Two equal-length periods show conflicting changes. Before increasing content production, the team examines traffic relevance and measurement continuity.

Fictional teaching case. Figures explain the reasoning; they are neither client results nor thresholds required by a standard.

clicks across the two periods
100 → 200
observed qualified enquiries
5 → 4
enquiries / clicks, assuming comparable scope
5% → 2%
Three possible decisions
Possible choiceMissing evidence or supporting reason
Claim a 100% commercial improvementClicks doubled; qualified enquiries declined.
Delete the new pagesThese figures alone do not attribute the decline to content.
Segment the data and check measurementCompare queries, pages, devices and whether the form works.
Read the decision and next check

Traffic growth calls for investigation of intent and journeys. The ratios 5/100 and 4/200 are interpretable only with coherent scope and comparable tracking. They do not establish causality.

The next check

Choose a real question and check the corresponding page, its sources, indexability and post-click task. For an AI citation, record tool, query, date, language and passage; distinguish one observation from a trend.

What this case does not demonstrate

Search Console clicks and site enquiries may concern different populations. The illustrative ratio must not be presented as individual attribution.

References and scope

References checked on 15 October 2026.

Before the assignment

Frame a useful decision

Analysis starts from audience questions and the pages answering them. It then checks crawler access, entity coherence, quality of evidence, language versions and the journey after discovery. SEO supports discovery; SXO checks the post-click experience; GEO examines how sources are understood and referenced in generated answers. Work prioritises explicit answers, attributed evidence and consistent entities. Measurement separates impressions, visits, observed citations and qualified enquiries without promising a ranking or systematic inclusion in an assistant.

Information to gather

  • Priority topics, audiences and regions
  • Reference pages and evidence of expertise
  • Search data and genuinely useful conversions

Decisions to prepare

  • Which topics deserve a dedicated page?
  • Which language versions are genuine equivalents?
  • How will discovery, citation and business outcomes be separated?
  • What evidence explains a crawl or indexing gap and who maintains the page?

Illustrative assignment

Situation
A translated site has many indexed pages, yet important audience questions still lack clear answers.
Work
Group intents, check language equivalents, crawler access, sources and the path to a useful action.
Deliverable
A topic map showing pages to improve, merge or create, a maintenance owner and separate measures of visibility and outcomes.

Example acceptance criteria to agree during scoping

  • Priority pages answer an intent and cite evidence.
  • Language alternatives are verified equivalents.
  • Observed citations, visits and business outcomes remain separate measures.
Related public methods

References: data, uses and limitations

Documentation reviewed on .

References: data, uses and limitations
Source and purposeVerified data or benchmarkHow to use itLimitation to retain
Google · AI features and your website

Understand inclusion in Google Search AI features.

 Google states that AI Overviews and AI Mode add no special technical requirements beyond applicable Search fundamentals. Check page access, indexability, snippet eligibility, links and useful textual content. Measure observed appearance, clicks and business outcomes separately.

Explore the method →

 Eligibility guarantees neither crawling, indexing nor display. This documentation concerns Google Search, not every AI assistant.
Google · Structured data

Describe page contents through machine-readable markup.

 Structured data helps search engines understand content. Marked properties should correspond to information actually present on the page. Choose a type matching the page and verify names, dates, relationships and sources. Check final rendering rather than only the template.

Explore the method →

 Valid markup alone does not guarantee a rich result. It replaces neither the content nor feature-specific eligibility conditions.

Publication and visibility in AI search

SEO, GEO and SXO: acceptance through to a useful page

Visibility work should connect technical conditions to accessible content and an observed user outcome.

  • Demonstrate applicable robots groups and indexing directives on representative URLs.
  • Compare effective Search AI settings with report impressions using consistent scope and time zone.
  • Check destination, cited source and post-click journey; valid configuration is not a citation guarantee.

Compare AI controls and report data →

References reviewed

Forms: criteria, errors and contrast

Errors belong to the multilingual journey

Translating a label is insufficient if the expected format, help or recovery message remains ambiguous. Test states in the journey’s language and direction.

  • Compare visible labels with accessible names.
  • Check instructions and suggestions against actually accepted formats.
  • Test keyboard, zoom and error recovery in right-to-left writing.

Open the WCAG review grid and contrast calculator →

W3C WAI · Forms Tutorial · User Notifications · Practical guidance · consulted 2026-10-23

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Practical answers to help frame the need before an initial conversation.

What is the difference between SEO, AEO, GEO and SXO?

SEO builds visibility in search results, AEO structures direct answers, GEO improves understanding and citation by generative engines, and SXO turns visibility into a useful user journey.

Does GEO require special markup?

There is no universal GEO markup. The work focuses on indexability, clear answers, coherent entities, evidence, internal linking and structured data that accurately reflects visible content.

When should an SEO or GEO recommendation be reviewed?

When a claim, source, URL or language edition changes, or search observations no longer match the studied scope. Repeat access and content checks, then compare engine, query, language and date. A single citation establishes neither lasting visibility nor a business effect.

Govern and maintain a useful content library

Google Search Central — Helpful, reliable, people-first content

Services

01Strategic intelligence & OSINT 02Cyber exposure review 03Applied AI & agents 04Due diligence & digital trust 05Secure, high-performance web