홈/주제/OSINT 및 정보 분석

OSINT 및 정보 분석

OSINT 및 정보 분석

공개 출처 정보 분석은 공개 정보를 구체적인 질문과 연결합니다. 출처, 날짜, 장소와 자료 간 독립성을 확인하고 단서와 확인된 사실을 구분하며 조사의 한계를 기록하세요.

OSINTCTIVerification
지도와 모니터, 자료가 놓인 빈 OSINT 책상
AI로 생성한 편집용 일러스트

이 주제의 내용

Open sources · Threat intelligence · Verification · Attribution · Provenance

실무 가이드

Verify a claim using open sources

How do you verify an open-source claim? Define a precise assertion, trace its earliest publication and seek evidence of different kinds. The expected output is an evidence record covering the claim, original URL, event date, access date, context, supporting material, contradictions and justified confidence. Missing information does not automatically establish that an event did not happen; repetition is not independent confirmation.

가이드 읽기 EN

뉴스 모니터링

모든 국제 뉴스 →

저장된 헤드라인 · 새로고침 불가 · 마지막 성공적 수집 : 2026. 10. 22. 오후 9:23

참고 자료: 데이터, 용도와 한계

문서 검토일 .

이 언어판의 상세 참고 설명은 영어로 제공됩니다.

참고 자료: 데이터, 용도와 한계
출처와 목적확인된 데이터 또는 기준사용 방법유지해야 할 한계
FIRST · Traffic Light Protocol

Indicate who may receive redistributed information.

TLP 2.0 uses RED, AMBER, GREEN and CLEAR; AMBER+STRICT restricts sharing to the recipient organisation. Labels must not be translated. Keep the marking with the information and check recipients before forwarding. Ask the source to clarify any ambiguity.

방법 자세히 보기 →

TLP is neither a formal classification nor a reuse licence. It does not guarantee content accuracy.
C2PA · Content Credentials

Describe and verify certain content provenance information.

C2PA specification 2.4 defines manifests, assertions and cryptographic binding mechanisms associated with media. Examine what the manifest asserts, who signed it and whether validation succeeds. Test preservation after transformations and distribution.

방법 자세히 보기 →

Validated provenance does not establish the truth of a scene. Absence of a manifest does not demonstrate a fake.
ICANN · Registration Data Lookup

Consult available domain registration information.

RDAP is the registration data access protocol. ICANN Lookup provides access to available public registration data. Keep the exact domain, consultation date and result. Distinguish registrar, technical service and the entity operating a website.

방법 자세히 보기 →

Data may be redacted or limited. Domain information alone cannot attribute content or an operation to a person.

미디어 출처 및 C2PA 검증

이 언어판의 상세 참고 설명은 영어로 제공됩니다.

Separate technical trace, source and judgment

Verifiable provenance helps describe a file’s history. Analysts must still check contextual claims and the independence of documents repeating them.

  • Associate each claim with its exact asset and source.
  • Trace repetitions to origins before describing corroboration.
  • Retain uncertainty and information that could change the judgment.

Open the C2PA explorer and publication cases →

References consulted on · C2PA · Content Credentials Explainer ODNI · ICD 203, Analytic Standards

OSINT: 증거 보존

이 언어판의 상세 참고 설명은 영어로 제공됩니다.

Usable intelligence retains the trail of its supporting material

Connect each conclusion to sources, preserved objects and working transformations. Custody complements corroboration; it does not turn unverified information into established fact.

  • Describe observed scope, capture limits and date uncertainty.
  • Separate preserved reference, technical copy and assessment extract.
  • Expose unconfirmed transfers and analytical assumptions.

See copy lineage and the eight preservation cases →

Sources reviewed on · NIST · Digital Evidence Preservation · NIST IR 8387 · Full report · NIST · SP 800-86 · NIST SP 800-86 · Full report · NIST · FIPS 180-4 · Secure Hash Standard

페이지 나누기: 일관성과 재개

이 언어판의 상세 참고 설명은 영어로 제공됩니다.

Reconcile collection identities and revisions

An exit inventory or OSINT collection can reach the last page while missing an object or mixing its revisions. A total alone does not establish that expected data is present.

  • Fix order, scope and consistency reference before reading.
  • Compare IDs and revisions beyond row counts.
  • Retain discrepancies and recovery decisions when the reference changes.

Compare computed reads and recoveries →

Sources reviewed on · Google · AIP-158 Pagination · PostgreSQL 18 · LIMIT and OFFSET · PostgreSQL 18 · Row constructor comparison · PostgreSQL 18 · Transaction isolation · OWASP · API1:2023 Broken Object Level Authorization