Neste tema
Training · Labs · Publications · Exercises · Careers · Communities
Build a cybersecurity learning path
How can cybersecurity progress be measured? Choose a task you must explain and carry out in an authorised lab. Define prerequisites, documentation, exercises and the expected outcome. Learning evidence can be an annotated configuration, log analysis or reproducible report. Distinguish observed results, assumptions and lab limitations before applying an exercise to a real environment.
Ler o guia ENMonitorização de notícias
Todas as notícias internacionais →Manchetes guardadas · atualização indisponível · Última obtenção bem-sucedida : 22 de out. de 2026, 21:19
Google lança o Harness2, os agentes de IA que melhoram sozinhos - Pasquale Pillitteri
via Google News · aggregatorNvidia promete US$ 250 milhões em computação para pesquisa de segurança de IA no Reino Unido - InvesTalk
via Google News · aggregatorPalestra “From AI Research to Real-World Application” - Universidade de Lisboa
via Google News · aggregatorPalestra “From AI Research to Real-World Application” - Técnico ULisboa
via Google News · aggregatorAnthropic diz que Claude lidera 26% de sua pesquisa e desenvolvimento de IA - Unite.AI
via Google News · aggregatorNio Stock Hits 52-Week Low: What's Happening? - TradingView
via Google News · aggregatorReferências: dados, usos e limites
Documentação consultada em .
As notas detalhadas desta edição estão disponíveis em inglês.
| Fonte e finalidade | Dado ou referência verificada | Como utilizar | Limite a preservar |
|---|---|---|---|
| MITRE · Common Weakness Enumeration Name classes of software and hardware weakness. |
A CWE describes a weakness that can contribute to vulnerabilities. It does not represent a particular incident. | Connect the weakness to the observed mechanism: input, processing and missing control. Use it to fix the cause and plan regression tests. | A keyword in a report alone does not establish the correct CWE classification. |
| W3C · WCAG 2.2 Evaluate accessibility criteria for web content. |
WCAG 2.2 is a W3C Recommendation. Success criteria have A, AA and AAA levels. | Define tasks, pages and states, then combine inspection, keyboard, zoom and relevant assistive technology. Keep reproduction steps for barriers. | An automated scanner does not establish conformity of a complete journey. Evaluation must cover interactive states and actual content. |
| Google · Core Web Vitals Distinguish loading, responsiveness and visual stability. |
Good thresholds are LCP ≤ 2.5 s, INP ≤ 200 ms and CLS ≤ 0.1 at the 75th percentile, segmented by mobile and desktop. | Separate field measurement from laboratory tests. Record period, URL, device, population and sample size before comparing changes. | These thresholds are not measured results for this site. A good lab score alone does not establish visitor experience. |

