CYInstellingen
Cybermalveillance.gouv.fr
Assistance and awareness resources for French audiences.
HET INTERNATIONALE CYBERPORTAAL / DIRECTORY
Een wereld vol expertise.
Overheidsinstellingen, responsteams, bedrijven en onderzoek. Vind passende bronnen voor uw land en uw behoeften.
Verdeling van FIRST-profielen · 883
Profielen in de momentopname : 883 ·
- Government, Private and Public sectors
252 / 883 252 - Other commercial
207 / 883 207 - Industrial sector
95 / 883 95 - Financial sector
94 / 883 94 - ICT vendor customer base
57 / 883 57 - Sector niet vermeld
50 / 883 50 - Government & military
46 / 883 46 - Research & education
45 / 883 45 - ISP customer base
37 / 883 37
Land en sector bepalen niet het verzorgingsgebied. Controleer de voorwaarden in het officiële profiel. FIRST ↗
INOnderzoek en opleiding
Inria
Research in digital science and technology.
NCInstellingen
NCSC · United Kingdom
Technical guidance, alerts and protection resources.
INInstellingen
INCIBE
Cybersecurity resources for businesses and citizens.
CEInstellingen
CERT.br
Incident response and security awareness in Brazil.
IPInstellingen
IPA · Japan
Information security, software and digital skills.
NADefensie
NATO CCDCOE
Cyber defence research, training and exercises.
ITInstellingen
ITU · Cybersecurity
International cooperation and digital capacity building.
OWGemeenschappen en standaarden
OWASP Foundation
Open projects for application and AI security.
AROnderzoek en opleiding
arXiv
Scientific preprints; peer review is not guaranteed.
HUBedrijfsleven
Hugging Face
AI models, datasets and open tools.
POBedrijfsleven
PortSwigger Web Security Academy
Web security learning in authorised labs.
BEGemeenschappen en standaarden
Bellingcat
Open-source verification methods and resources.
FIGemeenschappen en standaarden
FIRST · CVSS
Vulnerability severity specification and calculators. A score alone does not describe organisation-specific risk.
Broninformatie
- Gecontroleerde gegevens of maatstaf
- CVSS 4.0 scores run from 0.0 to 10.0. Base, Threat, Environmental and Supplemental metric groups serve different purposes.
- Praktisch gebruik
- Retain the score version, vector and date. Compare it with the installed version, access paths and business consequences before ordering remediation.
- Te behouden beperking
- A high score is not evidence of exploitation; a low score does not mean a service has no risk.
Documentatie geraadpleegd op
CVSS, EPSS, KEV en VEX
What is the technical severity under the assessed metrics?
The score proves neither exploitation nor consequences for your service.
Read the CVSS, EPSS, KEV and VEX reference →
Primary sources and scope
- FIRST · CVSS 4.0 Specification · CVSS 4.0 · document 1.2 · reviewed 2026-10-22
Overview · Assessment · Nomenclature · Supplemental Metrics
Sources checked on
CVGemeenschappen en standaarden
CVE Program
Public vulnerability identifiers and records. Check products, affected versions and links to original advisories.
Broninformatie
- Gecontroleerde gegevens of maatstaf
- A JSON schema defines the CVE record format. An identifier and the published contents of its record are distinct things.
- Praktisch gebruik
- Open the record and references; check its state, described affected versions and supplier information. Keep the identifier in action tracking.
- Te behouden beperking
- A CVE identifier is neither a severity score nor proof that your installation is affected.
Documentatie geraadpleegd op
NIInstellingen
NIST · National Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability database and technical enrichment. Cross-check records against vendor advisories and the deployed configuration.
NIInstellingen
NIST · AI Risk Management Framework
Voluntary framework and resources for documenting AI risks. Check the version and status of consulted documents.
Broninformatie
- Gecontroleerde gegevens of maatstaf
- The AI RMF Core is organised around Govern, Map, Measure and Manage. It is a voluntary risk-management framework.
- Praktisch gebruik
- Define intended use, affected people and error consequences. Connect each risk to an evaluation, owner and stop or recovery mechanism.
- Te behouden beperking
- The framework certifies neither a model nor an application. Using it does not remove the need to examine applicable requirements.
Documentatie geraadpleegd op
OWGemeenschappen en standaarden
OWASP · GenAI Security Project
Open risk reference for LLM and generative AI applications, including prompt injection, disclosure and excessive permissions.
Broninformatie
- Gecontroleerde gegevens of maatstaf
- The 2025 edition includes Prompt Injection, Sensitive Information Disclosure and Excessive Agency.
- Praktisch gebruik
- Turn a risk into an observable scenario: hostile document, restricted data or out-of-scope tool. Record expected behaviour and evidence of refusal.
- Te behouden beperking
- A risk list is not a complete assessment. Input filtering alone does not establish authorisation for every action.
Documentatie geraadpleegd op
RAG: toegangsrechten, citaten en caches
An accurate answer can disclose a forbidden document. Retrieval relevance, citation validity and access authorisation are separate checks. The service providing passages must enforce the current identity’s rights before exposing them to the model.
- OWASP · LLM08:2025 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses · 2025
- OWASP · LLM01:2025 Prompt Injection · 2025
- OWASP · LLM06:2025 Excessive Agency · 2025
- OWASP · LLM05:2025 Improper Output Handling · 2025
- OWASP · LLM07:2025 System Prompt Leakage · 2025
- OWASP · LLM10:2025 Unbounded Consumption · 2025
- OWASP · API1:2023 Broken Object Level Authorization · 2023
Explore the RAG access matrix and replay cases →
References consulted on
W3Gemeenschappen en standaarden
W3C · Web Accessibility Initiative
Standards, evaluation methods and web accessibility resources. Supports complete journey testing beyond automated checks.
GOBedrijfsleven
Google · Search Central
Official documentation on crawling, indexing and AI features in Google Search. Does not guarantee rankings or citations.
IAGemeenschappen en standaarden
IANA · Protocol Registries
Internet protocol parameter registries and related references. Use to check codes and numbers against their standardised context.
MIOnderzoek en opleiding
MITRE · Common Weakness Enumeration
Name classes of software and hardware weakness.
Broninformatie
- Gecontroleerde gegevens of maatstaf
- A CWE describes a weakness that can contribute to vulnerabilities. It does not represent a particular incident.
- Praktisch gebruik
- Connect the weakness to the observed mechanism: input, processing and missing control. Use it to fix the cause and plan regression tests.
- Te behouden beperking
- A keyword in a report alone does not establish the correct CWE classification.
Documentatie geraadpleegd op
W3Gemeenschappen en standaarden
W3C · WCAG 2.2
Evaluate accessibility criteria for web content.
Broninformatie
- Gecontroleerde gegevens of maatstaf
- WCAG 2.2 is a W3C Recommendation. Success criteria have A, AA and AAA levels.
- Praktisch gebruik
- Define tasks, pages and states, then combine inspection, keyboard, zoom and relevant assistive technology. Keep reproduction steps for barriers.
- Te behouden beperking
- An automated scanner does not establish conformity of a complete journey. Evaluation must cover interactive states and actual content.
Documentatie geraadpleegd op
GOBedrijfsleven
Google · Core Web Vitals
Distinguish loading, responsiveness and visual stability.
Broninformatie
- Gecontroleerde gegevens of maatstaf
- Good thresholds are LCP ≤ 2.5 s, INP ≤ 200 ms and CLS ≤ 0.1 at the 75th percentile, segmented by mobile and desktop.
- Praktisch gebruik
- Separate field measurement from laboratory tests. Record period, URL, device, population and sample size before comparing changes.
- Te behouden beperking
- These thresholds are not measured results for this site. A good lab score alone does not establish visitor experience.
Documentatie geraadpleegd op