EU公的機関
Europol · Cybercrime
Law enforcement cooperation and cybercrime publications.
国際サイバーポータル / DIRECTORY
世界の専門知識をつなぐ。
公的機関、対応チーム、企業、研究。国や課題に合った情報源を見つけましょう。
FIRSTプロフィールの分布 · 883
スナップショット内の件数 : 883 ·
- Government, Private and Public sectors
252 / 883 252 - Other commercial
207 / 883 207 - Industrial sector
95 / 883 95 - Financial sector
94 / 883 94 - ICT vendor customer base
57 / 883 57 - 部門の記載なし
50 / 883 50 - Government & military
46 / 883 46 - Research & education
45 / 883 45 - ISP customer base
37 / 883 37
国と部門だけでは対応範囲は判断できません。公式プロフィールで条件を確認してください。 FIRST ↗
CE公的機関
CERT Polska
Security reports and incident response in Poland.
JP公的機関
JPCERT/CC
Coordination, alerts and technical analysis in Japan.
FIコミュニティ・標準
FIRST
International network of incident response teams.
MI研究・教育
MITRE ATT&CK
Public knowledge base of documented adversary tactics and techniques.
資料の詳細
- 確認済みのデータ・指標
- ATT&CK is a knowledge base grounded in observations. Its domains include Enterprise, Mobile and ICS.
- 利用方法
- Connect a technique with a trace and detection hypothesis. Distinguish having a log source from actually testing detection.
- 留意する限界
- A shared technique cannot establish actor attribution. Technique coverage counts do not fully measure security.
資料確認日
GO民間企業
Google Threat Intelligence
Threat intelligence research publications.
UN民間企業
Unit 42 · Palo Alto Networks
Threat research and technical reports.
CI民間企業
Cisco Talos
Threat analysis and research publications.
BEコミュニティ・標準
Bellingcat
Open-source verification methods and resources.
FIコミュニティ・標準
FIRST · EPSS
Vulnerability exploitation probability model. Compare with technical severity, local exposure and business impact.
資料の詳細
- 確認済みのデータ・指標
- The model looks ahead 30 days. Its score is a probability; its percentile ranks that score relative to other CVEs.
- 利用方法
- Record the data date and distinguish probability from percentile. Add asset exposure and confirmed exploitation evidence.
- 留意する限界
- The model does not predict harm to your organisation. Low probability does not cancel a critical exposure.
資料確認日
CVSS・EPSS・KEV・VEX
What is the estimated probability of observing exploitation of this CVE in the next thirty days?
It does not describe compromise of your instance, its controls or business loss.
Read the CVSS, EPSS, KEV and VEX reference →
Primary sources and scope
- FIRST · EPSS Frequently Asked Questions · Living FAQ · reviewed 2026-10-22
What is EPSS? · Reading the score · Percentile · Score changes
Sources checked on
FIコミュニティ・標準
FIRST · Traffic Light Protocol
Security information-sharing designations set by the source. Check their meaning before redistribution.
資料の詳細
- 確認済みのデータ・指標
- TLP 2.0 uses RED, AMBER, GREEN and CLEAR; AMBER+STRICT restricts sharing to the recipient organisation. Labels must not be translated.
- 利用方法
- Keep the marking with the information and check recipients before forwarding. Ask the source to clarify any ambiguity.
- 留意する限界
- TLP is neither a formal classification nor a reuse licence. It does not guarantee content accuracy.
資料確認日
STIX指標とTLPによる共有
A traceable note does not by itself grant permission to redistribute it. TLP markings, additional restrictions and intended recipients must accompany a redaction or publication decision.
TLP describes a sharing scope; it certifies neither accuracy, official classification nor a usage licence. Encryption and retention rules need separate definition. Obtain explicit source permission before widening the received scope.
Read the STIX, observations and TLP sharing reference →
References and verification scope
- FIRST · Traffic Light Protocol 2.0 · TLP 2.0 · 2022-08
§1, §2, §3 · TLP:AMBER+STRICT
Sources checked on
ICコミュニティ・標準
ICANN · Registration Data Lookup
Domain registration data lookup. Redacted data or a technical provider alone cannot establish control by an entity.
資料の詳細
- 確認済みのデータ・指標
- RDAP is the registration data access protocol. ICANN Lookup provides access to available public registration data.
- 利用方法
- Keep the exact domain, consultation date and result. Distinguish registrar, technical service and the entity operating a website.
- 留意する限界
- Data may be redacted or limited. Domain information alone cannot attribute content or an operation to a person.
資料確認日
OAコミュニティ・標準
OASIS · STIX 2.1
Describe threat intelligence through structured objects and relationships.
資料の詳細
- 確認済みのデータ・指標
- STIX 2.1 is an OASIS Standard dated 10 June 2021. It defines objects, properties and JSON serialisation.
- 利用方法
- Keep identifiers, dates, provenance and relationships. Check that the recipient interprets the same object type and validity period.
- 留意する限界
- A syntactically valid object can still be stale, misattributed or weakly supported.
資料確認日
STIX指標とTLPによる共有
Structured intelligence retains provenance and a version history. For an actionable OSINT note, separate collected facts, the producer’s assertion and the local conclusion, then state what still needs confirmation.
Version note: at review time the OASIS latest-stage URL points to a document dated 2 April 2025 titled STIX 2.1 Errata 01, incorporating Draft 01. Its draft errata status is retained in the citation; it is not presented as a newly approved final version. Agree marking encodings with the recipient and check the edition actually used.
Read the STIX, observations and TLP sharing reference →
References and verification scope
- OASIS · STIX 2.1 · OASIS Standard · 2021-06-10
§3.2, §3.6, §4.7, §4.14, §5.2, §7.2 - OASIS · STIX 2.1 Errata 01 · Draft 01 · 2025-04-02 · OASIS Standard incorporating Draft 01 of Errata 01
Status / Citation format · draft status identified separately
Sources checked on
OAコミュニティ・標準
OASIS · TAXII 2.1
Exchange threat intelligence through an application protocol.
資料の詳細
- 確認済みのデータ・指標
- TAXII 2.1 is an OASIS Standard dated 10 June 2021. It includes service discovery and access to collections.
- 利用方法
- Test authentication, collection permissions, pagination and recovery after interruption. Record which objects were actually received and processed.
- 留意する限界
- TAXII transports data; it replaces neither the content model nor assessment of reliability.
資料確認日
C2コミュニティ・標準
C2PA · Content Credentials
Describe and verify certain content provenance information.
資料の詳細
- 確認済みのデータ・指標
- C2PA specification 2.4 defines manifests, assertions and cryptographic binding mechanisms associated with media.
- 利用方法
- Examine what the manifest asserts, who signed it and whether validation succeeds. Test preservation after transformations and distribution.
- 留意する限界
- Validated provenance does not establish the truth of a scene. Absence of a manifest does not demonstrate a fake.
資料確認日
メディアの来歴とC2PA検証
A provenance report combines findings with different scopes. Signature, credential trust, content binding and scene context are separate assurances. Retain the exact asset and full report before summarising a result.
This JSON-LD representation is a derived view of C2PA data for reporting and interoperability. It is not independently verifiable or a validation input format.
- C2PA · Content Credentials Technical Specification 2.4 · 2.4 · April 2026
- C2PA · Content Credentials Explainer · 2.4
- C2PA · Security Considerations · 2.4
Open the C2PA explorer and publication cases →
References consulted on