CYמוסדות
Cybermalveillance.gouv.fr
Assistance and awareness resources for French audiences.
פורטל הסייבר הבינלאומי / DIRECTORY
עולם של מומחיות.
מוסדות ציבוריים, צוותי תגובה, חברות ומחקר. מצאו מקורות מתאימים למדינה ולצרכים שלכם.
התפלגות פרופילי FIRST · 883
פרופילים בתמונת הנתונים : 883 ·
- Government, Private and Public sectors
252 / 883 252 - Other commercial
207 / 883 207 - Industrial sector
95 / 883 95 - Financial sector
94 / 883 94 - ICT vendor customer base
57 / 883 57 - מגזר לא צוין
50 / 883 50 - Government & military
46 / 883 46 - Research & education
45 / 883 45 - ISP customer base
37 / 883 37
המדינה והמגזר אינם קובעים את תחום השירות. יש לבדוק את התנאים בפרופיל הרשמי. FIRST ↗
INמחקר והכשרה
Inria
Research in digital science and technology.
NCמוסדות
NCSC · United Kingdom
Technical guidance, alerts and protection resources.
INמוסדות
INCIBE
Cybersecurity resources for businesses and citizens.
CEמוסדות
CERT.br
Incident response and security awareness in Brazil.
IPמוסדות
IPA · Japan
Information security, software and digital skills.
NAביטחון
NATO CCDCOE
Cyber defence research, training and exercises.
ITמוסדות
ITU · Cybersecurity
International cooperation and digital capacity building.
OWקהילות ותקנים
OWASP Foundation
Open projects for application and AI security.
ARמחקר והכשרה
arXiv
Scientific preprints; peer review is not guaranteed.
HUהמגזר הפרטי
Hugging Face
AI models, datasets and open tools.
POהמגזר הפרטי
PortSwigger Web Security Academy
Web security learning in authorised labs.
BEקהילות ותקנים
Bellingcat
Open-source verification methods and resources.
FIקהילות ותקנים
FIRST · CVSS
Vulnerability severity specification and calculators. A score alone does not describe organisation-specific risk.
פרטי המקור
- נתון או מדד מאומת
- CVSS 4.0 scores run from 0.0 to 10.0. Base, Threat, Environmental and Supplemental metric groups serve different purposes.
- כיצד להשתמש
- Retain the score version, vector and date. Compare it with the installed version, access paths and business consequences before ordering remediation.
- מגבלה שיש לשמר
- A high score is not evidence of exploitation; a low score does not mean a service has no risk.
מועד בדיקת התיעוד
CVSS, EPSS, KEV ו-VEX
What is the technical severity under the assessed metrics?
The score proves neither exploitation nor consequences for your service.
Read the CVSS, EPSS, KEV and VEX reference →
Primary sources and scope
- FIRST · CVSS 4.0 Specification · CVSS 4.0 · document 1.2 · reviewed 2026-10-22
Overview · Assessment · Nomenclature · Supplemental Metrics
Sources checked on
CVקהילות ותקנים
CVE Program
Public vulnerability identifiers and records. Check products, affected versions and links to original advisories.
פרטי המקור
- נתון או מדד מאומת
- A JSON schema defines the CVE record format. An identifier and the published contents of its record are distinct things.
- כיצד להשתמש
- Open the record and references; check its state, described affected versions and supplier information. Keep the identifier in action tracking.
- מגבלה שיש לשמר
- A CVE identifier is neither a severity score nor proof that your installation is affected.
מועד בדיקת התיעוד
NIמוסדות
NIST · National Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability database and technical enrichment. Cross-check records against vendor advisories and the deployed configuration.
NIמוסדות
NIST · AI Risk Management Framework
Voluntary framework and resources for documenting AI risks. Check the version and status of consulted documents.
פרטי המקור
- נתון או מדד מאומת
- The AI RMF Core is organised around Govern, Map, Measure and Manage. It is a voluntary risk-management framework.
- כיצד להשתמש
- Define intended use, affected people and error consequences. Connect each risk to an evaluation, owner and stop or recovery mechanism.
- מגבלה שיש לשמר
- The framework certifies neither a model nor an application. Using it does not remove the need to examine applicable requirements.
מועד בדיקת התיעוד
OWקהילות ותקנים
OWASP · GenAI Security Project
Open risk reference for LLM and generative AI applications, including prompt injection, disclosure and excessive permissions.
פרטי המקור
- נתון או מדד מאומת
- The 2025 edition includes Prompt Injection, Sensitive Information Disclosure and Excessive Agency.
- כיצד להשתמש
- Turn a risk into an observable scenario: hostile document, restricted data or out-of-scope tool. Record expected behaviour and evidence of refusal.
- מגבלה שיש לשמר
- A risk list is not a complete assessment. Input filtering alone does not establish authorisation for every action.
מועד בדיקת התיעוד
RAG: הרשאות, ציטוטים ומטמון
An accurate answer can disclose a forbidden document. Retrieval relevance, citation validity and access authorisation are separate checks. The service providing passages must enforce the current identity’s rights before exposing them to the model.
- OWASP · LLM08:2025 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses · 2025
- OWASP · LLM01:2025 Prompt Injection · 2025
- OWASP · LLM06:2025 Excessive Agency · 2025
- OWASP · LLM05:2025 Improper Output Handling · 2025
- OWASP · LLM07:2025 System Prompt Leakage · 2025
- OWASP · LLM10:2025 Unbounded Consumption · 2025
- OWASP · API1:2023 Broken Object Level Authorization · 2023
Explore the RAG access matrix and replay cases →
References consulted on
W3קהילות ותקנים
W3C · Web Accessibility Initiative
Standards, evaluation methods and web accessibility resources. Supports complete journey testing beyond automated checks.
GOהמגזר הפרטי
Google · Search Central
Official documentation on crawling, indexing and AI features in Google Search. Does not guarantee rankings or citations.
IAקהילות ותקנים
IANA · Protocol Registries
Internet protocol parameter registries and related references. Use to check codes and numbers against their standardised context.
MIמחקר והכשרה
MITRE · Common Weakness Enumeration
Name classes of software and hardware weakness.
פרטי המקור
- נתון או מדד מאומת
- A CWE describes a weakness that can contribute to vulnerabilities. It does not represent a particular incident.
- כיצד להשתמש
- Connect the weakness to the observed mechanism: input, processing and missing control. Use it to fix the cause and plan regression tests.
- מגבלה שיש לשמר
- A keyword in a report alone does not establish the correct CWE classification.
מועד בדיקת התיעוד
W3קהילות ותקנים
W3C · WCAG 2.2
Evaluate accessibility criteria for web content.
פרטי המקור
- נתון או מדד מאומת
- WCAG 2.2 is a W3C Recommendation. Success criteria have A, AA and AAA levels.
- כיצד להשתמש
- Define tasks, pages and states, then combine inspection, keyboard, zoom and relevant assistive technology. Keep reproduction steps for barriers.
- מגבלה שיש לשמר
- An automated scanner does not establish conformity of a complete journey. Evaluation must cover interactive states and actual content.
מועד בדיקת התיעוד
GOהמגזר הפרטי
Google · Core Web Vitals
Distinguish loading, responsiveness and visual stability.
פרטי המקור
- נתון או מדד מאומת
- Good thresholds are LCP ≤ 2.5 s, INP ≤ 200 ms and CLS ≤ 0.1 at the 75th percentile, segmented by mobile and desktop.
- כיצד להשתמש
- Separate field measurement from laboratory tests. Record period, URL, device, population and sample size before comparing changes.
- מגבלה שיש לשמר
- These thresholds are not measured results for this site. A good lab score alone does not establish visitor experience.
מועד בדיקת התיעוד