CYمؤسسات
Cybermalveillance.gouv.fr
Assistance and awareness resources for French audiences.
البوابة السيبرانية الدولية / DIRECTORY
عالم من الخبرات.
مؤسسات عامة وفرق استجابة وشركات وأبحاث. اعثر على المصادر المناسبة لبلدك واحتياجاتك.
توزيع ملفات FIRST · 883
ملفات في لقطة البيانات : 883 ·
- Government, Private and Public sectors
252 / 883 252 - Other commercial
207 / 883 207 - Industrial sector
95 / 883 95 - Financial sector
94 / 883 94 - ICT vendor customer base
57 / 883 57 - القطاع غير مذكور
50 / 883 50 - Government & military
46 / 883 46 - Research & education
45 / 883 45 - ISP customer base
37 / 883 37
لا يحدّد بلد الملف وقطاعه نطاق التدخل. تحقّق من الشروط في الملف الرسمي. FIRST ↗
INالبحث والتدريب
Inria
Research in digital science and technology.
NCمؤسسات
NCSC · United Kingdom
Technical guidance, alerts and protection resources.
INمؤسسات
INCIBE
Cybersecurity resources for businesses and citizens.
CEمؤسسات
CERT.br
Incident response and security awareness in Brazil.
IPمؤسسات
IPA · Japan
Information security, software and digital skills.
NAالدفاع
NATO CCDCOE
Cyber defence research, training and exercises.
ITمؤسسات
ITU · Cybersecurity
International cooperation and digital capacity building.
OWالمجتمعات والمعايير
OWASP Foundation
Open projects for application and AI security.
ARالبحث والتدريب
arXiv
Scientific preprints; peer review is not guaranteed.
HUالقطاع الخاص
Hugging Face
AI models, datasets and open tools.
POالقطاع الخاص
PortSwigger Web Security Academy
Web security learning in authorised labs.
BEالمجتمعات والمعايير
Bellingcat
Open-source verification methods and resources.
FIالمجتمعات والمعايير
FIRST · CVSS
Vulnerability severity specification and calculators. A score alone does not describe organisation-specific risk.
معلومات مرجعية
- بيانات أو معيار متحقق منه
- CVSS 4.0 scores run from 0.0 to 10.0. Base, Threat, Environmental and Supplemental metric groups serve different purposes.
- كيفية الاستخدام
- Retain the score version, vector and date. Compare it with the installed version, access paths and business consequences before ordering remediation.
- حدود يجب مراعاتها
- A high score is not evidence of exploitation; a low score does not mean a service has no risk.
تاريخ مراجعة الوثائق
CVSS وEPSS وKEV وVEX
What is the technical severity under the assessed metrics?
The score proves neither exploitation nor consequences for your service.
Read the CVSS, EPSS, KEV and VEX reference →
Primary sources and scope
- FIRST · CVSS 4.0 Specification · CVSS 4.0 · document 1.2 · reviewed 2026-10-22
Overview · Assessment · Nomenclature · Supplemental Metrics
Sources checked on
CVالمجتمعات والمعايير
CVE Program
Public vulnerability identifiers and records. Check products, affected versions and links to original advisories.
معلومات مرجعية
- بيانات أو معيار متحقق منه
- A JSON schema defines the CVE record format. An identifier and the published contents of its record are distinct things.
- كيفية الاستخدام
- Open the record and references; check its state, described affected versions and supplier information. Keep the identifier in action tracking.
- حدود يجب مراعاتها
- A CVE identifier is neither a severity score nor proof that your installation is affected.
تاريخ مراجعة الوثائق
NIمؤسسات
NIST · National Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability database and technical enrichment. Cross-check records against vendor advisories and the deployed configuration.
NIمؤسسات
NIST · AI Risk Management Framework
Voluntary framework and resources for documenting AI risks. Check the version and status of consulted documents.
معلومات مرجعية
- بيانات أو معيار متحقق منه
- The AI RMF Core is organised around Govern, Map, Measure and Manage. It is a voluntary risk-management framework.
- كيفية الاستخدام
- Define intended use, affected people and error consequences. Connect each risk to an evaluation, owner and stop or recovery mechanism.
- حدود يجب مراعاتها
- The framework certifies neither a model nor an application. Using it does not remove the need to examine applicable requirements.
تاريخ مراجعة الوثائق
OWالمجتمعات والمعايير
OWASP · GenAI Security Project
Open risk reference for LLM and generative AI applications, including prompt injection, disclosure and excessive permissions.
معلومات مرجعية
- بيانات أو معيار متحقق منه
- The 2025 edition includes Prompt Injection, Sensitive Information Disclosure and Excessive Agency.
- كيفية الاستخدام
- Turn a risk into an observable scenario: hostile document, restricted data or out-of-scope tool. Record expected behaviour and evidence of refusal.
- حدود يجب مراعاتها
- A risk list is not a complete assessment. Input filtering alone does not establish authorisation for every action.
تاريخ مراجعة الوثائق
RAG: حقوق الوصول والاستشهادات والذاكرة المؤقتة
An accurate answer can disclose a forbidden document. Retrieval relevance, citation validity and access authorisation are separate checks. The service providing passages must enforce the current identity’s rights before exposing them to the model.
- OWASP · LLM08:2025 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses · 2025
- OWASP · LLM01:2025 Prompt Injection · 2025
- OWASP · LLM06:2025 Excessive Agency · 2025
- OWASP · LLM05:2025 Improper Output Handling · 2025
- OWASP · LLM07:2025 System Prompt Leakage · 2025
- OWASP · LLM10:2025 Unbounded Consumption · 2025
- OWASP · API1:2023 Broken Object Level Authorization · 2023
Explore the RAG access matrix and replay cases →
References consulted on
W3المجتمعات والمعايير
W3C · Web Accessibility Initiative
Standards, evaluation methods and web accessibility resources. Supports complete journey testing beyond automated checks.
GOالقطاع الخاص
Google · Search Central
Official documentation on crawling, indexing and AI features in Google Search. Does not guarantee rankings or citations.
IAالمجتمعات والمعايير
IANA · Protocol Registries
Internet protocol parameter registries and related references. Use to check codes and numbers against their standardised context.
MIالبحث والتدريب
MITRE · Common Weakness Enumeration
Name classes of software and hardware weakness.
معلومات مرجعية
- بيانات أو معيار متحقق منه
- A CWE describes a weakness that can contribute to vulnerabilities. It does not represent a particular incident.
- كيفية الاستخدام
- Connect the weakness to the observed mechanism: input, processing and missing control. Use it to fix the cause and plan regression tests.
- حدود يجب مراعاتها
- A keyword in a report alone does not establish the correct CWE classification.
تاريخ مراجعة الوثائق
W3المجتمعات والمعايير
W3C · WCAG 2.2
Evaluate accessibility criteria for web content.
معلومات مرجعية
- بيانات أو معيار متحقق منه
- WCAG 2.2 is a W3C Recommendation. Success criteria have A, AA and AAA levels.
- كيفية الاستخدام
- Define tasks, pages and states, then combine inspection, keyboard, zoom and relevant assistive technology. Keep reproduction steps for barriers.
- حدود يجب مراعاتها
- An automated scanner does not establish conformity of a complete journey. Evaluation must cover interactive states and actual content.
تاريخ مراجعة الوثائق
GOالقطاع الخاص
Google · Core Web Vitals
Distinguish loading, responsiveness and visual stability.
معلومات مرجعية
- بيانات أو معيار متحقق منه
- Good thresholds are LCP ≤ 2.5 s, INP ≤ 200 ms and CLS ≤ 0.1 at the 75th percentile, segmented by mobile and desktop.
- كيفية الاستخدام
- Separate field measurement from laboratory tests. Record period, URL, device, population and sample size before comparing changes.
- حدود يجب مراعاتها
- These thresholds are not measured results for this site. A good lab score alone does not establish visitor experience.
تاريخ مراجعة الوثائق