CY公共机构
Cybermalveillance.gouv.fr
Assistance and awareness resources for French audiences.
国际网络安全门户 / DIRECTORY
连接全球专业知识。
公共机构、响应团队、企业与研究。寻找适合您所在国家和需求的信息源。
FIRST资料分布 · 883
快照中的资料数 : 883 ·
- Government, Private and Public sectors
252 / 883 252 - Other commercial
207 / 883 207 - Industrial sector
95 / 883 95 - Financial sector
94 / 883 94 - ICT vendor customer base
57 / 883 57 - 未说明领域
50 / 883 50 - Government & military
46 / 883 46 - Research & education
45 / 883 45 - ISP customer base
37 / 883 37
国家和领域不能确定其服务范围。请在官方资料中确认服务条件。 FIRST ↗
IN研究与教育
Inria
Research in digital science and technology.
NC公共机构
NCSC · United Kingdom
Technical guidance, alerts and protection resources.
IN公共机构
INCIBE
Cybersecurity resources for businesses and citizens.
CE公共机构
CERT.br
Incident response and security awareness in Brazil.
IP公共机构
IPA · Japan
Information security, software and digital skills.
NA防务
NATO CCDCOE
Cyber defence research, training and exercises.
IT公共机构
ITU · Cybersecurity
International cooperation and digital capacity building.
OW社区与标准
OWASP Foundation
Open projects for application and AI security.
AR研究与教育
arXiv
Scientific preprints; peer review is not guaranteed.
HU私营部门
Hugging Face
AI models, datasets and open tools.
PO私营部门
PortSwigger Web Security Academy
Web security learning in authorised labs.
BE社区与标准
Bellingcat
Open-source verification methods and resources.
FI社区与标准
FIRST · CVSS
Vulnerability severity specification and calculators. A score alone does not describe organisation-specific risk.
参考资料详情
- 已核实的数据或指标
- CVSS 4.0 scores run from 0.0 to 10.0. Base, Threat, Environmental and Supplemental metric groups serve different purposes.
- 使用方法
- Retain the score version, vector and date. Compare it with the installed version, access paths and business consequences before ordering remediation.
- 需要保留的局限
- A high score is not evidence of exploitation; a low score does not mean a service has no risk.
文档核查日期
CVSS、EPSS、KEV 与 VEX
What is the technical severity under the assessed metrics?
The score proves neither exploitation nor consequences for your service.
Read the CVSS, EPSS, KEV and VEX reference →
Primary sources and scope
- FIRST · CVSS 4.0 Specification · CVSS 4.0 · document 1.2 · reviewed 2026-10-22
Overview · Assessment · Nomenclature · Supplemental Metrics
Sources checked on
CV社区与标准
CVE Program
Public vulnerability identifiers and records. Check products, affected versions and links to original advisories.
参考资料详情
- 已核实的数据或指标
- A JSON schema defines the CVE record format. An identifier and the published contents of its record are distinct things.
- 使用方法
- Open the record and references; check its state, described affected versions and supplier information. Keep the identifier in action tracking.
- 需要保留的局限
- A CVE identifier is neither a severity score nor proof that your installation is affected.
文档核查日期
NI公共机构
NIST · National Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability database and technical enrichment. Cross-check records against vendor advisories and the deployed configuration.
NI公共机构
NIST · AI Risk Management Framework
Voluntary framework and resources for documenting AI risks. Check the version and status of consulted documents.
参考资料详情
- 已核实的数据或指标
- The AI RMF Core is organised around Govern, Map, Measure and Manage. It is a voluntary risk-management framework.
- 使用方法
- Define intended use, affected people and error consequences. Connect each risk to an evaluation, owner and stop or recovery mechanism.
- 需要保留的局限
- The framework certifies neither a model nor an application. Using it does not remove the need to examine applicable requirements.
文档核查日期
OW社区与标准
OWASP · GenAI Security Project
Open risk reference for LLM and generative AI applications, including prompt injection, disclosure and excessive permissions.
参考资料详情
- 已核实的数据或指标
- The 2025 edition includes Prompt Injection, Sensitive Information Disclosure and Excessive Agency.
- 使用方法
- Turn a risk into an observable scenario: hostile document, restricted data or out-of-scope tool. Record expected behaviour and evidence of refusal.
- 需要保留的局限
- A risk list is not a complete assessment. Input filtering alone does not establish authorisation for every action.
文档核查日期
RAG：访问权限、引用与缓存
An accurate answer can disclose a forbidden document. Retrieval relevance, citation validity and access authorisation are separate checks. The service providing passages must enforce the current identity’s rights before exposing them to the model.
- OWASP · LLM08:2025 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses · 2025
- OWASP · LLM01:2025 Prompt Injection · 2025
- OWASP · LLM06:2025 Excessive Agency · 2025
- OWASP · LLM05:2025 Improper Output Handling · 2025
- OWASP · LLM07:2025 System Prompt Leakage · 2025
- OWASP · LLM10:2025 Unbounded Consumption · 2025
- OWASP · API1:2023 Broken Object Level Authorization · 2023
Explore the RAG access matrix and replay cases →
References consulted on
W3社区与标准
W3C · Web Accessibility Initiative
Standards, evaluation methods and web accessibility resources. Supports complete journey testing beyond automated checks.
GO私营部门
Google · Search Central
Official documentation on crawling, indexing and AI features in Google Search. Does not guarantee rankings or citations.
IA社区与标准
IANA · Protocol Registries
Internet protocol parameter registries and related references. Use to check codes and numbers against their standardised context.
MI研究与教育
MITRE · Common Weakness Enumeration
Name classes of software and hardware weakness.
参考资料详情
- 已核实的数据或指标
- A CWE describes a weakness that can contribute to vulnerabilities. It does not represent a particular incident.
- 使用方法
- Connect the weakness to the observed mechanism: input, processing and missing control. Use it to fix the cause and plan regression tests.
- 需要保留的局限
- A keyword in a report alone does not establish the correct CWE classification.
文档核查日期
W3社区与标准
W3C · WCAG 2.2
Evaluate accessibility criteria for web content.
参考资料详情
- 已核实的数据或指标
- WCAG 2.2 is a W3C Recommendation. Success criteria have A, AA and AAA levels.
- 使用方法
- Define tasks, pages and states, then combine inspection, keyboard, zoom and relevant assistive technology. Keep reproduction steps for barriers.
- 需要保留的局限
- An automated scanner does not establish conformity of a complete journey. Evaluation must cover interactive states and actual content.
文档核查日期
GO私营部门
Google · Core Web Vitals
Distinguish loading, responsiveness and visual stability.
参考资料详情
- 已核实的数据或指标
- Good thresholds are LCP ≤ 2.5 s, INP ≤ 200 ms and CLS ≤ 0.1 at the 75th percentile, segmented by mobile and desktop.
- 使用方法
- Separate field measurement from laboratory tests. Record period, URL, device, population and sample size before comparing changes.
- 需要保留的局限
- These thresholds are not measured results for this site. A good lab score alone does not establish visitor experience.
文档核查日期