В этой теме
Public doctrine · Resilience · Defence · Satellites · Information conflict
Build a cyber defence watch from public sources
How can you monitor cyber defence without confusing signals, communications and evidence? Bound a strategic question, establish a chronology and assess original sources. A useful brief identifies affected infrastructure, civilian dependencies, verified facts and unknowns. It states what would change the assessment and which defensive actions merit review. This guide concerns documentary analysis of public material.
Читать руководство ENМониторинг новостей
Все международные новости →Сохранённые заголовки · обновление недоступно · Последняя успешная загрузка : 22 окт. 2026 г., 21:23
OpenAI, Anthropic и более 100 компаний подписали письмо о киберзащите от ИИ - Pasquale Pillitteri
via Google News · aggregatorUAE-based EDGE and Brazilian Army to establish Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence in Brazil - Defensehere
via Google News · aggregatorКалифорния запускает первую в США госпрограмму киберзащиты на основе нейросетей - SecurityLab.ru
via Google News · aggregatorХакеры парализовали работу администрации крупного города в Калифорнии - SlavicSac.com
via Google News · aggregatorЦЕНТКОМ проводит 30-е учения «Региональное сотрудничество» - US Central Command (.mil)
via Google News · aggregatorВсе ведущие LLM провалили первый бенчмарк по киберзащите. Что это значит для SOC - Хабр
via Google News · aggregatorИсточники: данные, применение и ограничения
Документация проверена .
Подробные справочные заметки в этой версии доступны на английском.
| Источник и назначение | Проверенные данные или ориентир | Как использовать | Сохраняемое ограничение |
|---|---|---|---|
| FIRST · Traffic Light Protocol Indicate who may receive redistributed information. |
TLP 2.0 uses RED, AMBER, GREEN and CLEAR; AMBER+STRICT restricts sharing to the recipient organisation. Labels must not be translated. | Keep the marking with the information and check recipients before forwarding. Ask the source to clarify any ambiguity. | TLP is neither a formal classification nor a reuse licence. It does not guarantee content accuracy. |
| OASIS · STIX 2.1 Describe threat intelligence through structured objects and relationships. |
STIX 2.1 is an OASIS Standard dated 10 June 2021. It defines objects, properties and JSON serialisation. | Keep identifiers, dates, provenance and relationships. Check that the recipient interprets the same object type and validity period. | A syntactically valid object can still be stale, misattributed or weakly supported. |
| MITRE ATT&CK Connect observations with adversary tactics and techniques. |
ATT&CK is a knowledge base grounded in observations. Its domains include Enterprise, Mobile and ICS. | Connect a technique with a trace and detection hypothesis. Distinguish having a log source from actually testing detection. | A shared technique cannot establish actor attribution. Technique coverage counts do not fully measure security. |
Индикаторы STIX и обмен TLP
Подробные справочные заметки в этой версии доступны на английском.
Connect the indicator to observations and retirement
An indicator match opens an analytical lead. To assess its significance, preserve observed events, technical context, sensor coverage and alternative hypotheses.
- Distinguish Indicator, Observed Data and Sighting; an intelligence assertion does not replace observed data.
- Do not equate a DNS resolution with execution or a Sighting count=0 with worldwide threat absence.
- Assign an owner and a mechanism for retiring derived rules after expiry or revocation.
Read the STIX, observations and TLP sharing reference →
Sources checked on · OASIS · STIX 2.1