CYInstituutiot
Cybermalveillance.gouv.fr
Assistance and awareness resources for French audiences.
KANSAINVÄLINEN KYBERPORTAALI / DIRECTORY
Maailma täynnä osaamista.
Viranomaiset, vastetiimit, yritykset ja tutkimus. Löydä maallesi ja tarpeisiisi sopivat lähteet.
FIRST-profiilien jakauma · 883
Profiileja tilannekuvassa : 883 ·
- Government, Private and Public sectors
252 / 883 252 - Other commercial
207 / 883 207 - Industrial sector
95 / 883 95 - Financial sector
94 / 883 94 - ICT vendor customer base
57 / 883 57 - Sektoria ei ilmoitettu
50 / 883 50 - Government & military
46 / 883 46 - Research & education
45 / 883 45 - ISP customer base
37 / 883 37
Maa ja sektori eivät määritä palvelun kohderyhmää. Tarkista ehdot virallisesta profiilista. FIRST ↗
INTutkimus ja koulutus
Inria
Research in digital science and technology.
NCInstituutiot
NCSC · United Kingdom
Technical guidance, alerts and protection resources.
INInstituutiot
INCIBE
Cybersecurity resources for businesses and citizens.
CEInstituutiot
CERT.br
Incident response and security awareness in Brazil.
IPInstituutiot
IPA · Japan
Information security, software and digital skills.
NAPuolustus
NATO CCDCOE
Cyber defence research, training and exercises.
ITInstituutiot
ITU · Cybersecurity
International cooperation and digital capacity building.
OWYhteisöt ja standardit
OWASP Foundation
Open projects for application and AI security.
ARTutkimus ja koulutus
arXiv
Scientific preprints; peer review is not guaranteed.
HUYksityinen sektori
Hugging Face
AI models, datasets and open tools.
POYksityinen sektori
PortSwigger Web Security Academy
Web security learning in authorised labs.
BEYhteisöt ja standardit
Bellingcat
Open-source verification methods and resources.
FIYhteisöt ja standardit
FIRST · CVSS
Vulnerability severity specification and calculators. A score alone does not describe organisation-specific risk.
Lähdetiedot
- Tarkistettu tieto tai vertailukohta
- CVSS 4.0 scores run from 0.0 to 10.0. Base, Threat, Environmental and Supplemental metric groups serve different purposes.
- Käyttö käytännössä
- Retain the score version, vector and date. Compare it with the installed version, access paths and business consequences before ordering remediation.
- Huomioitava rajoitus
- A high score is not evidence of exploitation; a low score does not mean a service has no risk.
Aineisto tarkistettu
CVSS, EPSS, KEV ja VEX
What is the technical severity under the assessed metrics?
The score proves neither exploitation nor consequences for your service.
Read the CVSS, EPSS, KEV and VEX reference →
Primary sources and scope
- FIRST · CVSS 4.0 Specification · CVSS 4.0 · document 1.2 · reviewed 2026-10-22
Overview · Assessment · Nomenclature · Supplemental Metrics
Sources checked on
CVYhteisöt ja standardit
CVE Program
Public vulnerability identifiers and records. Check products, affected versions and links to original advisories.
Lähdetiedot
- Tarkistettu tieto tai vertailukohta
- A JSON schema defines the CVE record format. An identifier and the published contents of its record are distinct things.
- Käyttö käytännössä
- Open the record and references; check its state, described affected versions and supplier information. Keep the identifier in action tracking.
- Huomioitava rajoitus
- A CVE identifier is neither a severity score nor proof that your installation is affected.
Aineisto tarkistettu
NIInstituutiot
NIST · National Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability database and technical enrichment. Cross-check records against vendor advisories and the deployed configuration.
NIInstituutiot
NIST · AI Risk Management Framework
Voluntary framework and resources for documenting AI risks. Check the version and status of consulted documents.
Lähdetiedot
- Tarkistettu tieto tai vertailukohta
- The AI RMF Core is organised around Govern, Map, Measure and Manage. It is a voluntary risk-management framework.
- Käyttö käytännössä
- Define intended use, affected people and error consequences. Connect each risk to an evaluation, owner and stop or recovery mechanism.
- Huomioitava rajoitus
- The framework certifies neither a model nor an application. Using it does not remove the need to examine applicable requirements.
Aineisto tarkistettu
OWYhteisöt ja standardit
OWASP · GenAI Security Project
Open risk reference for LLM and generative AI applications, including prompt injection, disclosure and excessive permissions.
Lähdetiedot
- Tarkistettu tieto tai vertailukohta
- The 2025 edition includes Prompt Injection, Sensitive Information Disclosure and Excessive Agency.
- Käyttö käytännössä
- Turn a risk into an observable scenario: hostile document, restricted data or out-of-scope tool. Record expected behaviour and evidence of refusal.
- Huomioitava rajoitus
- A risk list is not a complete assessment. Input filtering alone does not establish authorisation for every action.
Aineisto tarkistettu
RAG: käyttöoikeudet, viitteet ja välimuistit
An accurate answer can disclose a forbidden document. Retrieval relevance, citation validity and access authorisation are separate checks. The service providing passages must enforce the current identity’s rights before exposing them to the model.
- OWASP · LLM08:2025 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses · 2025
- OWASP · LLM01:2025 Prompt Injection · 2025
- OWASP · LLM06:2025 Excessive Agency · 2025
- OWASP · LLM05:2025 Improper Output Handling · 2025
- OWASP · LLM07:2025 System Prompt Leakage · 2025
- OWASP · LLM10:2025 Unbounded Consumption · 2025
- OWASP · API1:2023 Broken Object Level Authorization · 2023
Explore the RAG access matrix and replay cases →
References consulted on
W3Yhteisöt ja standardit
W3C · Web Accessibility Initiative
Standards, evaluation methods and web accessibility resources. Supports complete journey testing beyond automated checks.
GOYksityinen sektori
Google · Search Central
Official documentation on crawling, indexing and AI features in Google Search. Does not guarantee rankings or citations.
IAYhteisöt ja standardit
IANA · Protocol Registries
Internet protocol parameter registries and related references. Use to check codes and numbers against their standardised context.
MITutkimus ja koulutus
MITRE · Common Weakness Enumeration
Name classes of software and hardware weakness.
Lähdetiedot
- Tarkistettu tieto tai vertailukohta
- A CWE describes a weakness that can contribute to vulnerabilities. It does not represent a particular incident.
- Käyttö käytännössä
- Connect the weakness to the observed mechanism: input, processing and missing control. Use it to fix the cause and plan regression tests.
- Huomioitava rajoitus
- A keyword in a report alone does not establish the correct CWE classification.
Aineisto tarkistettu
W3Yhteisöt ja standardit
W3C · WCAG 2.2
Evaluate accessibility criteria for web content.
Lähdetiedot
- Tarkistettu tieto tai vertailukohta
- WCAG 2.2 is a W3C Recommendation. Success criteria have A, AA and AAA levels.
- Käyttö käytännössä
- Define tasks, pages and states, then combine inspection, keyboard, zoom and relevant assistive technology. Keep reproduction steps for barriers.
- Huomioitava rajoitus
- An automated scanner does not establish conformity of a complete journey. Evaluation must cover interactive states and actual content.
Aineisto tarkistettu
GOYksityinen sektori
Google · Core Web Vitals
Distinguish loading, responsiveness and visual stability.
Lähdetiedot
- Tarkistettu tieto tai vertailukohta
- Good thresholds are LCP ≤ 2.5 s, INP ≤ 200 ms and CLS ≤ 0.1 at the 75th percentile, segmented by mobile and desktop.
- Käyttö käytännössä
- Separate field measurement from laboratory tests. Record period, URL, device, population and sample size before comparing changes.
- Huomioitava rajoitus
- These thresholds are not measured results for this site. A good lab score alone does not establish visitor experience.
Aineisto tarkistettu