CYInstitutionen
Cybermalveillance.gouv.fr
Assistance and awareness resources for French audiences.
DAS INTERNATIONALE CYBERPORTAL / DIRECTORY
Eine Welt voller Expertise.
Behörden, Reaktionsteams, Unternehmen und Forschung. Finden Sie passende Quellen für Ihr Land und Ihre Anforderungen.
Verteilung der FIRST-Profile · 883
Profile im Datenstand : 883 ·
- Government, Private and Public sectors
252 / 883 252 - Other commercial
207 / 883 207 - Industrial sector
95 / 883 95 - Financial sector
94 / 883 94 - ICT vendor customer base
57 / 883 57 - Sektor nicht angegeben
50 / 883 50 - Government & military
46 / 883 46 - Research & education
45 / 883 45 - ISP customer base
37 / 883 37
Land und Sektor bestimmen nicht den Zuständigkeitsbereich. Prüfen Sie die Bedingungen im offiziellen Profil. FIRST ↗
INForschung & Ausbildung
Inria
Research in digital science and technology.
NCInstitutionen
NCSC · United Kingdom
Technical guidance, alerts and protection resources.
INInstitutionen
INCIBE
Cybersecurity resources for businesses and citizens.
CEInstitutionen
CERT.br
Incident response and security awareness in Brazil.
IPInstitutionen
IPA · Japan
Information security, software and digital skills.
NAVerteidigung
NATO CCDCOE
Cyber defence research, training and exercises.
ITInstitutionen
ITU · Cybersecurity
International cooperation and digital capacity building.
OWGemeinschaften & Standards
OWASP Foundation
Open projects for application and AI security.
ARForschung & Ausbildung
arXiv
Scientific preprints; peer review is not guaranteed.
HUPrivatwirtschaft
Hugging Face
AI models, datasets and open tools.
POPrivatwirtschaft
PortSwigger Web Security Academy
Web security learning in authorised labs.
BEGemeinschaften & Standards
Bellingcat
Open-source verification methods and resources.
FIGemeinschaften & Standards
FIRST · CVSS
Vulnerability severity specification and calculators. A score alone does not describe organisation-specific risk.
Quelleninformationen
- Geprüfte Daten oder Richtwerte
- CVSS 4.0 scores run from 0.0 to 10.0. Base, Threat, Environmental and Supplemental metric groups serve different purposes.
- Praktische Nutzung
- Retain the score version, vector and date. Compare it with the installed version, access paths and business consequences before ordering remediation.
- Zu beachtende Grenze
- A high score is not evidence of exploitation; a low score does not mean a service has no risk.
Dokumentation geprüft am
CVSS, EPSS, KEV und VEX
What is the technical severity under the assessed metrics?
The score proves neither exploitation nor consequences for your service.
Read the CVSS, EPSS, KEV and VEX reference →
Primary sources and scope
- FIRST · CVSS 4.0 Specification · CVSS 4.0 · document 1.2 · reviewed 2026-10-22
Overview · Assessment · Nomenclature · Supplemental Metrics
Sources checked on
CVGemeinschaften & Standards
CVE Program
Public vulnerability identifiers and records. Check products, affected versions and links to original advisories.
Quelleninformationen
- Geprüfte Daten oder Richtwerte
- A JSON schema defines the CVE record format. An identifier and the published contents of its record are distinct things.
- Praktische Nutzung
- Open the record and references; check its state, described affected versions and supplier information. Keep the identifier in action tracking.
- Zu beachtende Grenze
- A CVE identifier is neither a severity score nor proof that your installation is affected.
Dokumentation geprüft am
NIInstitutionen
NIST · National Vulnerability Database
Vulnerability database and technical enrichment. Cross-check records against vendor advisories and the deployed configuration.
NIInstitutionen
NIST · AI Risk Management Framework
Voluntary framework and resources for documenting AI risks. Check the version and status of consulted documents.
Quelleninformationen
- Geprüfte Daten oder Richtwerte
- The AI RMF Core is organised around Govern, Map, Measure and Manage. It is a voluntary risk-management framework.
- Praktische Nutzung
- Define intended use, affected people and error consequences. Connect each risk to an evaluation, owner and stop or recovery mechanism.
- Zu beachtende Grenze
- The framework certifies neither a model nor an application. Using it does not remove the need to examine applicable requirements.
Dokumentation geprüft am
OWGemeinschaften & Standards
OWASP · GenAI Security Project
Open risk reference for LLM and generative AI applications, including prompt injection, disclosure and excessive permissions.
Quelleninformationen
- Geprüfte Daten oder Richtwerte
- The 2025 edition includes Prompt Injection, Sensitive Information Disclosure and Excessive Agency.
- Praktische Nutzung
- Turn a risk into an observable scenario: hostile document, restricted data or out-of-scope tool. Record expected behaviour and evidence of refusal.
- Zu beachtende Grenze
- A risk list is not a complete assessment. Input filtering alone does not establish authorisation for every action.
Dokumentation geprüft am
RAG: Zugriffsrechte, Zitate und Caches
An accurate answer can disclose a forbidden document. Retrieval relevance, citation validity and access authorisation are separate checks. The service providing passages must enforce the current identity’s rights before exposing them to the model.
- OWASP · LLM08:2025 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses · 2025
- OWASP · LLM01:2025 Prompt Injection · 2025
- OWASP · LLM06:2025 Excessive Agency · 2025
- OWASP · LLM05:2025 Improper Output Handling · 2025
- OWASP · LLM07:2025 System Prompt Leakage · 2025
- OWASP · LLM10:2025 Unbounded Consumption · 2025
- OWASP · API1:2023 Broken Object Level Authorization · 2023
Explore the RAG access matrix and replay cases →
References consulted on
W3Gemeinschaften & Standards
W3C · Web Accessibility Initiative
Standards, evaluation methods and web accessibility resources. Supports complete journey testing beyond automated checks.
GOPrivatwirtschaft
Google · Search Central
Official documentation on crawling, indexing and AI features in Google Search. Does not guarantee rankings or citations.
IAGemeinschaften & Standards
IANA · Protocol Registries
Internet protocol parameter registries and related references. Use to check codes and numbers against their standardised context.
MIForschung & Ausbildung
MITRE · Common Weakness Enumeration
Name classes of software and hardware weakness.
Quelleninformationen
- Geprüfte Daten oder Richtwerte
- A CWE describes a weakness that can contribute to vulnerabilities. It does not represent a particular incident.
- Praktische Nutzung
- Connect the weakness to the observed mechanism: input, processing and missing control. Use it to fix the cause and plan regression tests.
- Zu beachtende Grenze
- A keyword in a report alone does not establish the correct CWE classification.
Dokumentation geprüft am
W3Gemeinschaften & Standards
W3C · WCAG 2.2
Evaluate accessibility criteria for web content.
Quelleninformationen
- Geprüfte Daten oder Richtwerte
- WCAG 2.2 is a W3C Recommendation. Success criteria have A, AA and AAA levels.
- Praktische Nutzung
- Define tasks, pages and states, then combine inspection, keyboard, zoom and relevant assistive technology. Keep reproduction steps for barriers.
- Zu beachtende Grenze
- An automated scanner does not establish conformity of a complete journey. Evaluation must cover interactive states and actual content.
Dokumentation geprüft am
GOPrivatwirtschaft
Google · Core Web Vitals
Distinguish loading, responsiveness and visual stability.
Quelleninformationen
- Geprüfte Daten oder Richtwerte
- Good thresholds are LCP ≤ 2.5 s, INP ≤ 200 ms and CLS ≤ 0.1 at the 75th percentile, segmented by mobile and desktop.
- Praktische Nutzung
- Separate field measurement from laboratory tests. Record period, URL, device, population and sample size before comparing changes.
- Zu beachtende Grenze
- These thresholds are not measured results for this site. A good lab score alone does not establish visitor experience.
Dokumentation geprüft am